Path to election Nullification: "Dominion" Software
Plus the 14th Amendment

For U.S. Citizens, there is no clearer or more sacred expression of the "Equal Protection Under Law" clause of our Constitution's 14th Amendment than the individual Citizen's vote -- commonly expressed as, "One Person; One Vote".

Use of "Dominion" Software for tallying or "tabulating" votes will be shown to be a de facto violation of "One Person; One vote."

Each individual's single vote is indivisible-- an integer, a whole number equal to one. Nor can any voter divide their vote between two choices; the entire unit vote must be devoted to a single choice.

Votes are counted -- not "calculated". There is no legal justification for "tabulation" methods or software that "calculate", "compute" or otherwise "manipulate" votes as anything other than single, whole number, integer objects.

Likewise, there is zero justification (aside from clear intent to commit fraud) for vote recording and tabulation equipment and/or software that treats votes as fractions, rather than as indivisible integers. Specifically, the "voting and tabulation" system of machines and software known variously as "Dominion", "DVM", "Sequoia", "Smartmatic", "Scytl", et alia, calculates votes as "floating-point decimal" fractions.

.

Even worse, "Dominion" has a designed-in "Feature" called, "Race Weighting" that re-allocates votes per a percentage ratio -- entered by an operator or administrator. Use of a documented Biden=55% to Trump=45% ratio will be demonstrated, and a reported Biden=125% to Trump=75% ratio will be illustrated.

Evidence of "Race Weighting" ratio cheating via re-assigning votes from one candidate to another abound -- as in this example from Virginia, which uses a Biden=55% to Trump=45% ratio. (The "54%" in the "Biden weighting" column was achieved by selective rounding before reporting. The actual "55%" batch results appear at right.

The "Biden = 55% : Trump="45%" ratio was applied to each individual vote batch. (Note the two identical batches at right -- overtinted in aqua. If the Biden and Trump votes are each rounded, the batch total is 20. if Buden & Trump are summed, then rounded -- the batch total is 21 votes. What is the starting batch total?

For illustrative purposes, a hypothetical exact one hundred (100)-vote batch (eliminating fractions) is depicted below:

  1. A batch of votes is selected for manipulation.

  2. The total number of batch votes is calculated -- ("anonymized" -- because vote "ownership" is disregarded).

  3. The weighting ratio is applied to the Batch Total, creating a new allocation of results. Biden gains 25 votes.

  4. Trump loses 25 votes.
(Lest objection be made re the selection of a Biden 30-vote vs Trump 70-vote batch composition, consider that many entire counties exceeded that performance for Trump -- where DVM systems were not used.)

However, DVM-type systems were used in all of the contested "battleground States".

By "normalizing" the "Weighting Ratio", (dividing both sides of the ratio by the larger of the two percentages) the impact on individual voters can be calculated:

Graphically, the impact on individual voters clearly displays inequality:

Even more dramatically, the use of a 125%:75% Biden:Trump "Race-Weighting" ratio was reported in at least one State:

That "3/5" value for the Trump voter should look familiar:

The 1787 "3/5 Compromise" valued slaves as "3/5 of a person" for purposes of census counting to determine representation. The Compromise" was repealed by the 14th Amendment.

Depicted graphically, that normalized 125%:75% weighting ratio shows the worth of a Trump voter to be only 3/5 of that of a Biden voter:

Is the value of any voting citizen in 2020 the same as that of a slave in 1787?

Inequalities do not have to be as drastic as depicted to violate the 14th amendment. Any voting inequality other than One person; One [Whole Integer] Vote renders all voters unequally represented.

Dominion® et al, software invites unequality by processing integer votes as decimal fractions. And it guarantees fraudulent unequality and vote theft by employing "Race Weighting Ratio" calculations.